MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308440598 · doi:10.1002/cjs.11732

Pretest and shrinkage estimators in generalized partially linear models with application to real data

2022· article· en· W4308440598 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Statistics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Winnipeg
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsEstimatorCovariateParametric statisticsLinear modelDimension (graph theory)Nonparametric statisticsLinear regressionMathematicsInferenceModel selectionMonte Carlo methodStatistical inferenceComputer scienceStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Semiparametric models hold promise to address many challenges to statistical inference that arise from real‐world applications, but their novelty and theoretical complexity create challenges for estimation. Taking advantage of the broad applicability of semiparametric models, we propose some novel and improved methods to estimate the regression coefficients of generalized partially linear models (GPLM). This model extends the generalized linear model by adding a nonparametric component. Like in parametric models, variable selection is important in the GPLM to single out the inactive covariates for the response. Instead of deleting inactive covariates, our approach uses them as auxiliary information in the estimation procedure. We then define two models, one that includes all the covariates and another that includes the active covariates only. We then combine these two model estimators optimally to form the pretest and shrinkage estimators. Asymptotic properties are studied to derive the asymptotic biases and risks of the proposed estimators. We show that if the shrinkage dimension exceeds two, the asymptotic risks of the shrinkage estimators are strictly less than those of the full model estimators. Extensive Monte Carlo simulation studies are conducted to examine the finite‐sample performance of the proposed estimation methods. We then apply our proposed methods to two real data sets. Our simulation and real data results show that the proposed estimators perform with higher accuracy and lower variability in the estimation of regression parameters for GPLM compared with competing estimation methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it