MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308473138 · doi:10.1002/aic.17953

Modeling, simulation, and optimization of multiproduct cryogenic air separation unit startup

2022· article· en· W4308473138 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIChE Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAir separationHeat exchangerProcess (computing)Dynamic simulationClassification of discontinuitiesComputer scienceSeparation (statistics)SimulationProcess engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The startup of multiproduct cryogenic air separation plants takes several hours, during which time limited revenue is generated with high costs incurred due to the highly energy‐intensive nature of these operations. This motivates the development of high‐fidelity dynamic models to capture the complexity of the startup process to aid decision‐making. This article focuses on the development of a startup model for a multiproduct air separation unit (ASU), and its use in dynamic simulation and optimization. To accomplish this, a first‐principles based dynamic ASU model is extended by including various discontinuities using smooth approximations, adding dynamics to the primary heat exchanger, and extending the handling phase change within process streams. Dynamic simulations demonstrate plant response behavior during startup, including a failed startup resulting from an injudicious choice of input trajectory. In addition, improvement of startup operation is demonstrated through the incorporation of the model within a dynamic optimization framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it