MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308500716 · doi:10.1002/crso.20233

What’s the Scope of 4R Practices for Reducing Emissions from Fertilizer?

2022· article· en· W4308500716 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tom Bruulsema

Bibliographic record

VenueCrops & Soils · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhosphorus and nutrient management
Canadian institutionsPlant Biotechnology Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)Greenhouse gasFertilizerEnvironmental scienceNitrogen fertilizerAgricultural engineeringNatural resource economicsAgricultural economicsBusinessAgronomyComputer scienceEconomicsEngineeringEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fertilizer use has been a key factor in boosting crop yields worldwide. At the same time, the global use of nitrogen fertilizer is associated with greenhouse gas emissions This article reviews the scope for reducing emissions associated with fertilizer use. It addresses the global scale and recent reports focused on Canada, the United States, and sub‐Saharan Africa. It concludes with a review of the advantages and limitations of approaches based on managing nitrogen surplus in crop nutrient budgets and shows how a 4R approach both includes and goes beyond reducing surpluses. Earn 1 CEU in Nutrient Management by reading this article and taking the quiz at https://web.sciencesocieties.org/Learning‐Center/Courses .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.010
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrops & SoilsSame topicPhosphorus and nutrient managementFrench-language works237,207