MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308507024 · doi:10.22329/jcb.v1i1.7695

Introduction from the Editors/ Introduction des rédacteurs

2022· article· en· W4308507024 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrew North, Christian Trudeau, Heidi Jacobs

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Baseball · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWindsorCover (algebra)Library scienceMedia studiesPolitical scienceFeature (linguistics)SociologyEngineeringComputer sciencePhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Welcome to the Journal of Canadian Baseball, a joint initiative of the University of Windsor and the Centrefor Canadian Baseball Research. We aim to feature under one cover the research of two contributingcommunities, both the scholarly of the academics and the popular of the baseball historians. From both the Grovesand the Fields, if you will.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.699

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2090.196

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian BaseballSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207