Le coaching des cadres et le psychologue double bind ?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le « coaching » propose des accompagnements, surtout aux cadres, pour développer la productivité et la performance. Les lacunes sont nombreuses : discussion des postulats, approche scientifique, variabilité des coachs, des dynamiques psychiques, des situations de travail réel... Mais les besoins des cadres sont majeurs, notamment dans la fonction publique française. De plus, le coaching interroge les pratiques des psychologues et des intervenants en santé au travail. Cette communication approfondit ces constats et discute ces pratiques. Les interactions entre l’analyse qualitative de terrain et les apports théoriques permettent une approche exploratoire pluridisciplinaire. La variété des dispositifs en santé au travail et d’accompagnement des cadres nécessite d’être sécurisée scientifiquement. Les garanties doivent être construites ou réaffirmées, comme dans le Code de déontologie des psychologues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it