MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308566757 · doi:10.5430/jct.v11n8p250

Differences in Creative Personality and Attitude, Creative Problem Solving, and Convergence Thinking of College Students According to Self-Regulation and Cognitive Flexibility Training VR Program Participation

2022· article· en· W4308566757 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Curriculum and Teaching · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducation and Learning Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreativityPsychologyCronbach's alphaPersonalityDescriptive statisticsCreative problem-solvingCognitionFlexibility (engineering)Convergence (economics)Applied psychologyMathematics educationSocial psychologyStatisticsDevelopmental psychologyMathematicsPsychometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study used a cognitive flexibility training VR program that can view and solve problems from various perspectives, self-regulation, and self-regulation with the super cognitive ability required for creativity to improve college students' creative personality and attitude, creative problem solving, and convergence thinking ability. In addition, differences in creative personality and attitude, creative problem solving, and convergence thinking ability were analyzed before and after participation in the program. In this study, 55 students were recruited voluntarily among four-year E University students in Gyeonggi-do. The experimental tool is VR content developed by FNI Co., Ltd. The main contents are mainly composed of improving self-control ability, strengthening positivity, and enhancing interpersonal relationships. The IBM SPSS Statistics 25 program was used to analyze the collected data to test the research question. First, frequency analysis and descriptive statistical analysis were performed to examine the mean and standard deviation of the sociodemographic factors and measurement variables of the subjects. Moreover, to determine how consistently the measuring instrument was used, the reliability was validated by calculating the Cronbach's coefficient value. Furthermore, factor analysis was utilized to minimize the number of items in the developed measurement tool by removing variables unrelated to the component to be studied. Factor analysis has the purpose of reducing variables, removing unnecessary variables, identifying variable characteristics, evaluating the validity of measurement items, and creating variables using factor scores. In addition, to confirm the statistical significance of the average values of creative personality and attitude, creative problem solving, and convergence thinking before and after participating in the VR program, a matched-sample t-test was performed. As a result of the study, it was found that participation in the self-regulation and cognitive flexibility VR program had a positive effect after participation compared to before participation in creative personality and attitude, creative problem solving, and convergence thinking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it