MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308571543 · doi:10.3389/fmars.2022.1035413

Nuclear transformation of a dinoflagellate symbiont of corals

2022· article· en· W4308571543 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sebastian G. Gornik, Ira Maegele, Elizabeth A. Hambleton, Philipp A. Voss, Ross F. Waller, Annika Guse

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Marine Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of CambridgeGovernment of CanadaEuropean Molecular Biology LaboratoryGordon and Betty Moore Foundation
KeywordsDinoflagellateBiologyTransformation (genetics)CoralSymbiodiniumGreen fluorescent proteinAnthozoaGeneCell biologySymbiosisGeneticsEcologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dinoflagellates are a diverse and ecologically important group of single-celled eukaryotes. Many are photosynthetic autotrophs while others are predatory, parasitic, or symbiotic. One major group — the Symbiodiniaceae — is well known for its role as coral symbionts that provide the coral host with vital nutrients. While genetic transformation protocols have been published for some non-symbiotic dinoflagellate species, robust methods for genetic manipulation of coral symbionts are lacking, hindering a detailed molecular understanding of this critical symbiotic interaction. Here, we describe the successful transformation of coral symbiont Breviolum minutum (strain SSB01). Using Golden Gate modular plasmid assembly and electroporation, we drove transient NLS-GFP expression from an endogenous dinoflagellate virus nuclear protein (DVNP) promoter and successfully targeted GFP to the dinoflagellate nucleus. We further determined that puromycin can efficiently select transformed cells using the puromycin N-acetyltransferase ( pac ) resistance gene. Transformed cells could be maintained under antibiotic selection for at least 12 months without losing resistance, albeit with slowly attenuating fluorescence signal. We thus tested the expression of hybrid GFP-2A-PAC polypeptides under the control of a single promoter sequence to overcome loss of fluorescence, but lack of efficient 2A cleavage seemingly hindered antibiotic selection interfering GFP function. Despite this, our transformation approach now allows unanswered questions of dinoflagellate biology to be addressed, as well as fundamental aspects of dinoflagellate-coral symbiosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Marine ScienceSame topicCoral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesFrench-language works237,207