MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308588650 · doi:10.54097/fbem.v6i1.2292

Rising Role of China in the Asia-Pacific Interconnected Economies: Current Status and Future Opportunities

2022· article· en· W4308588650 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shuya Pei

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Business Economics and Management · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaInternationalizationEconomyAsia pacificInternational tradeFlourishingPosition (finance)East AsiaBusinessGeographyDevelopment economicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the rising role of China in the Asia-Pacific interconnected economy. This research utilizes export data to analyze, includes the quarterly international export data of Australia and Japan with its partner countries, the export data with China, Japan and the US as partner country with the typical countries include Canada, Mexico, USA, Australia, Japan, Chile, New Zealand, China and Indonesia. The results indicate that a) the significant role of China in international GVCs and in Asia-Pacific interconnected economy, b) the flourishing transaction value between these three years indicates the rising role of China all over the world, c) the essential position of the Chinese economy in the Asian economy, the joint Asia-Pacific economy, the potential of China as a developing country economy and the strength of its domestic industries. As for managerial implications, China is recommended to seize the initiative, expand its influence and insist on the development of Belt and Road strategy. The limitation of this study is that the diversity of observations. In a broader sense, more research is required to determine the universality or internationalization of the study subjects and comparisons across numerous time periods. Additionally, some industries may have an impact on each nation's export transaction values; this is a topic that merits additional study and application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.943

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Business Economics and ManagementSame topicGlobal trade and economicsFrench-language works237,207