MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308601926 · doi:10.4000/crdf.8404

Choses sacrées, choses publiques : la propriété culturelle en débat

2022· article· fr· W4308601926 on OpenAlexaff
Marie Cornu

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de la recherche sur les droits fondamentaux · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les choses sacrées au musée sont au contact intime des œuvres. Voilà bien longtemps qu’elles se côtoient dans cet espace particulièrement propice pour accueillir des sortes de choses retirées du commerce. En dépit de l’abandon de cette catégorie dans les classifications des choses et biens, le sacré dans le droit continue d’être un intérêt juridiquement protégé. La propriété culturelle, notamment les régimes spéciaux de domanialité publique, assure cette mise à part du monde. Cela étant, leur charge de sacré varie. En particulier, le corps humain, conservé et exposé au musée sous toutes ses formes, est sans doute au plus haut degré une chose hors commerce. Sa présence dans ces lieux soulève de grandes questions sur la nature des droits et obligations auxquels il donne prise, sur la possibilité même d’une propriété. Les deux couples d’opposition garde versus propriété, choses dans et hors commerce font singulièrement sens dans le champ de la propriété culturelle, dans lequel, selon la formule de Proudhon, l’État « régit, administre, conserve et protège ».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.658
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de la recherche sur les droits fondamentauxSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207