La Cour africaine des droits de l’homme et des peuples scie la branche sur laquelle elle est assise : quelques observations à propos de l’arrêt Ochieng Anudo c. République-Unie de Tanzanie du 22 mars 2018
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans l’arrêt Ochieng Anudo c. République-Unie de Tanzanie du 22 mars 2018, la Cour africaine des droits de l’homme et des peuples a sanctionné la violation du droit à la nationalité du requérant, sur la base de l’article 15(1) de la Déclaration universelle des droits de l’homme (DUDH), après avoir reconnu que ni la Charte africaine ni aucun autre traité international ne garantit ce droit. Pour justifier sa position, elle note simplement que la DUDH a déjà acquis le statut de norme coutumière. Cet argument jurisprudentiel, du reste isolé, ne résiste pas à la critique. Cet excès de zèle de la Cour constitue non seulement un mépris des règles relatives à sa compétence, mais également une mise en péril du particularisme du système africain des droits de l’homme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".