Sparse prediction informed by genetic annotations using the logit normal prior for Bayesian regression tree ensembles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using high-dimensional genetic variants such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) to predict complex diseases and traits has important applications in basic research and other clinical settings. For example, predicting gene expression is a necessary first step to identify (putative) causal genes in transcriptome-wide association studies. Due to weak signals, high-dimensionality, and linkage disequilibrium (correlation) among SNPs, building such a prediction model is challenging. However, functional annotations at the SNP level (e.g., as epigenomic data across multiple cell- or tissue-types) are available and could be used to inform predictor importance and aid in outcome prediction. Existing approaches to incorporate annotations have been based mainly on (generalized) linear models. Bayesian additive regression trees (BART), in contrast, is a reliable method to obtain high-quality nonlinear out of sample predictions without overfitting. Unfortunately, the default prior from BART may be too inflexible to handle sparse situations where the number of predictors approaches or surpasses the number of observations. Motivated by our real data application, this article proposes an alternative prior based on the logit normal distribution because it provides a framework that is adaptive to sparsity and can model informative functional annotations. It also provides a framework to incorporate prior information about the between SNP correlations. Computational details for carrying out inference are presented along with the results from a simulation study and a genome-wide prediction analysis of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".