PENTINGNYA PEMBELAJARAN MENULIS PUISI DISEKOLAH DI ERA SOCIETY 5.0
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Era Society 5.0 mulanya di pelopori oleh Pemerintah Jepang, dan di rancang dalam Rencana Dasar Sains dan Teknologi ke-5 oleh Dewan Sains, Teknologi dan Inovasi lalu disetujui oleh keputusan Kabinet pada Januari 2016. Society 5.0 adalah konsep dan strategi yang tujuannya sama dengan SDGs. Untuk mempersiapkan revolusi industri 5.0, pendidikan diperlukan untuk mengembangkan generasi yang kreatif, inovatif, dan kompetitif. Salah satunya melalui kemampuan menulis puisi. Puisi mempromosikan literasi, membangun komunitas, dan menstimulasi aspek perkembangan emosional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan atau menjelaskan pentingnya pembelajaran menulis puisi disekolah pada era Society 5.0. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif, data diperoleh berasal dari penelitian sebelumnya atau penelitian relevan sebagai data sekunder. Hasil penelitian secara keseluruhan membuktikan bahwa pembelajaran menulis puisi disekolah dinilai sangat penting dikarenakan dapat menumbuhkan kesadaran Bahasa, berpikir kritis, meningkatkan kreativitas dan antusiasme serta membangun komunitas.’
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.211 | 0.066 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".