MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308707052 · doi:10.25157/literasi.v6i2.7681

PENTINGNYA PEMBELAJARAN MENULIS PUISI DISEKOLAH DI ERA SOCIETY 5.0

2022· article· id· W4308707052 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLiterasi Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia serta Pembelajarannya · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Character Development
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Era Society 5.0 mulanya di pelopori oleh Pemerintah Jepang, dan di rancang dalam Rencana Dasar Sains dan Teknologi ke-5 oleh Dewan Sains, Teknologi dan Inovasi lalu disetujui oleh keputusan Kabinet pada Januari 2016. Society 5.0 adalah konsep dan strategi yang tujuannya sama dengan SDGs. Untuk mempersiapkan revolusi industri 5.0, pendidikan diperlukan untuk mengembangkan generasi yang kreatif, inovatif, dan kompetitif. Salah satunya melalui kemampuan menulis puisi. Puisi mempromosikan literasi, membangun komunitas, dan menstimulasi aspek perkembangan emosional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan atau menjelaskan pentingnya pembelajaran menulis puisi disekolah pada era Society 5.0. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif, data diperoleh berasal dari penelitian sebelumnya atau penelitian relevan sebagai data sekunder. Hasil penelitian secara keseluruhan membuktikan bahwa pembelajaran menulis puisi disekolah dinilai sangat penting dikarenakan dapat menumbuhkan kesadaran Bahasa, berpikir kritis, meningkatkan kreativitas dan antusiasme serta membangun komunitas.’

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it