MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308748381 · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2022.108734

Dataset of top-down nitrogen oxides fire emission estimation in northeastern Asia

2022· article· en· W4308748381 on OpenAlexaff
Yuyun Fu, Rui Li, Jiheng Hu, Yipu Wang, Jiawei Duan

Bibliographic record

VenueData in Brief · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNOxEnvironmental scienceNitrogen oxidesAtmospheric sciencesSmokeHuman healthEmission inventoryRadiative transferAtmosphere (unit)Air pollutionMeteorologySatelliteCombustionAir quality indexGeographyChemistryGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fire emission is a major source of atmospheric nitrogen oxides (NOx = NO2 + NO), accounting for a large part of global NOx emission, which profoundly changes atmosphere physicochemical property and impacts human society. An effective evaluation of these impacts relies on accurate NOx fire emission estimation. In this article, we developed a full top-down NOx fire emission dataset for northeastern Asia based on the satellite-derived emission coefficient (EC) and fire radiative power (FRP) density. In the dataset, daily NOx fire emissions during 2012–2019 were estimated at 1°x1° resolution across northeastern Asia, which can be used as fundamental input data in driving climate and weather models, and can be applied to investigate the characteristic of fire emission, fire-climate interaction, air pollution and human health effect. As a full top-down emission dataset, it can also serve as a reference for other existing emission inventories that are mostly based on bottom-up approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData in BriefSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207