Longitudinal Patterns of Functional Connectivity in Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Longitudinal neuroimaging studies aid our understanding of recovery mechanisms in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, there is a dearth of longitudinal functional connectivity research. Our aim was to characterize longitudinal functional connectivity patterns in two clinically important brain networks, the frontoparietal network (FPN) and the default mode network (DMN), in moderate-to-severe TBI. This inception cohort study of prospectively collected longitudinal data used resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to characterize functional connectivity patterns in the FPN and DMN. Forty adults with moderate-to-severe TBI (mean ± standard deviation [SD]; age = 39.53 ± 16.49 years, education = 13.92 ± 3.20 years, lowest Glasgow Coma Scale score = 6.63 ± 3.24, sex = 70% male) were scanned at approximately 0.5, 1–1.5, and 3+ years post-injury. Seventeen healthy, uninjured participants (mean ± SD; age = 38.91 ± 15.57 years, education = 15.11 ± 2.71 years, sex = 29% male) were scanned at baseline and approximately 11 months afterwards. Group independent component analyses and linear mixed-effects modeling with linear splines that contained a knot at 1.5 years post-injury were employed to investigate longitudinal network changes, and associations with covariates, including age, sex, and injury severity. In patients with TBI, functional connectivity in the right FPN increased from approximately 0.5 to 1.5 years post-injury (unstandardized estimate = 0.19, standard error [SE] = 0.07, p = 0.009), contained a slope change in the opposite direction, from positive to negative at 1.5 years post-injury (estimate = −0.21, SE = 0.11, p = 0.009), and marginally declined afterwards (estimate = −0.10, SE = 0.06, p = 0.079). Functional connectivity in the DMN increased from approximately 0.5 to 1.5 years (estimate = 0.15, SE = 0.05, p = 0.006), contained a slope change in the opposite direction, from positive to negative at 1.5 years post-injury (estimate = −0.19, SE = 0.08, p = 0.021), and was estimated to decline from 1.5 to 3+ years (estimate = −0.04, SE = 0.04, p = 0.303). Similarly, the left FPN increased in functional connectivity from approximately 0.5 to 1.5 years post-injury (estimate = 0.15, SE = 0.05, p = 0.002), contained a slope change in the opposite direction, from positive to negative at 1.5 years post-injury (estimate = −0.18, SE = 0.07, p = 0.008), and was estimated to decline thereafter (estimate = −0.04, SE = 0.03, p = 0.254). At approximately 0.5 years post-injury, patients showed hypoconnectivity compared with healthy, uninjured participants at baseline. Covariates were not significantly associated in any of the models. Findings of early improvement but a tapering and possible decline in connectivity thereafter suggest that compensatory effects are time-limited. These later reductions in connectivity mirror growing evidence of behavioral and structural decline in chronic moderate-to-severe TBI. Targeting such declines represents a novel avenue of research and offers potential for improving clinical outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".