Gravity Data Imaging Using Local Wavenumber-Based Algorithm: Sustainable Development Cases Studies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A fast effective inversion algorithm is proposed herein to interpret gravitational responses caused by mineralized/ore sources (sphere, vertical and horizontal cylinders). The algorithm relies on local wavenumber and correlation imaging techniques. The correlation factor ( R ) between the local wavenumber of observed gravitational field and that of computed field was calculated, and the maximum R max was considered to correspond to the best true model (parameters). The proposed algorithm was applied to two theoretical examples, including an example contaminated with regional background and another multisource example. Besides, the proposed approach was used on three different real field cases for mining/ore investigation from Canada and Cuba. From the results obtained from the theoretical and real examples and by comparing the results with drilling and literature information, it was concluded that the method is effective, is applicable even for more than one source, is accurate, and does not necessitate any prior knowledge of the source shape.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it