MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308883928 · doi:10.1364/ao.476308

Practical approach for optimizing off-axis telecentric digital holographic microscope design

2022· article· en· W4308883928 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Optics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDigital Holography and Microscopy
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsOpticsDigital holographic microscopyHolographyInterference (communication)Computer scienceMicroscopyStray lightDigital holographyRotation (mathematics)PhysicsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digital holographic microscopy (DHM) has become an attractive imaging tool for the analysis of living cells and histological tissues. Telecentric DHM (TDHM) is a configuration of DHM that reduces the computational demands through a priori aberration corrections. However, TDHM requires a well-aligned optical pipeline to optimize its resolution and image quality (IQ), which has traditionally complicated the alignment process. Derived from optical interference functions, we offer here a set of methodologies to simplify TDHM design and alignment by determining the optimal +1-order position, which depends on the object-reference beam angle and the interference plane rotation angle. The methods are then experimentally tested and verified on a TDHM system by imaging living HeLa cells in suspension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it