GILoop: Robust chromatin loop calling across multiple sequencing depths on Hi-C data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
-contact maps. Existing computational tools have only adopted Hi-C data modeled as unitary data structures but neglected the potential advantages of synergizing the information of different views. Here we propose GILoop, a dual-branch neural network that learns from both representations to identify genome-wide CTCF-mediated loops. With GILoop, we explore the combined strength of integrating the two view representations of Hi-C data and corroborate the complementary relationship between the views. In particular, the model outperforms the state-of-the-art loop calling framework and is also more robust against low-quality Hi-C libraries. We also uncover distinct preferences for matrix density by graph-based and image-based models, revealing interesting insights into Hi-C data elucidation. Finally, along with multiple transfer-learning case studies, we demonstrate that GILoop can accurately model the organizational and functional patterns of CTCF-mediated looping across different cell lines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".