MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308938087 · doi:10.7573/dic.2022-9-2

Tinea versicolor: an updated review

2022· review· en· W4308938087 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrugs in Context · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNail Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTinea versicolorPityriasisMedicineDermatologyAdverse effectAntifungalMalasseziaAntifungal drugClinical trialMiconazoleInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Tinea versicolor is a common superficial fungal infection of the skin with various clinical manifestations. This review aims to familiarize physicians with the clinical features, diagnosis and management of tinea versicolor. Methods: A search was conducted in July 2022 in PubMed Clinical Queries using the key terms "tinea versicolor" OR "pityriasis versicolor". The search strategy included all clinical trials, observational studies and reviews published within the past 10 years. Results: . The condition is characterized by scaly hypopigmented or hyperpigmented macules/patches, primarily located on the upper trunk, neck and upper arms. The diagnosis is usually based on characteristic clinical features. If necessary, a potassium hydroxide preparation test can be performed to reveal numerous short, stubby hyphae intermixed with clusters of spores. Most patients with tinea versicolor respond to topical antifungal therapy, which has a better safety profile (fewer adverse events, fewer drug interactions) and lower cost compared to systemic treatment and is therefore the treatment of choice. Oral antifungal therapy is typically reserved for patients with extensive disease, frequent recurrences or disease that is refractory to topical therapy. Advantages of oral antifungal therapy include increased patient compliance, shorter duration of treatment, increased convenience, less time involved with therapy and reduced recurrence rates. On the other hand, oral antifungal therapy is associated with higher cost, greater adverse events and potential drug-drug interactions and is therefore not the first-line treatment for tinea versicolor. Long-term intermittent prophylactic therapy should be considered for patients with frequent recurrence of the disease. Conclusion: Selection of antifungal agents depends on several factors, including efficacy, safety, local availability, ease of administration, likelihood of compliance and potential drug interactions of the antifungal agent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it