MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308961904 · doi:10.1101/2022.11.11.516234

OpenMEA: Open-Source Microelectrode Array Platform for Bioelectronic Interfacing

2022· preprint· en· W4308961904 on OpenAlexaff
Gerard O’Leary, Iouri Khramtsov, Rakshith Ramesh, Aidan Perez-Ignacio, Prajay Shah, Homeira Moradi Chameh, Adam Gierlach, Roman Genov, Taufik A. Valiante

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterfacingMultielectrode arrayComputer scienceNeuroscienceNeuroprostheticsMicroelectrodeDeep brain stimulationBrain stimulationFunctional electrical stimulationNeural engineeringStimulationBiomedical engineeringComputer hardwareMedicineArtificial intelligenceDiseaseBiologyParkinson's diseaseChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bioelectronic interfaces have the potential to revolutionize the treatment of medical disorders and augment physiology. Implantable devices such as pacemakers and deep brain stimulators have already been deployed to control activity in diseases including Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy. These devices typically operate by delivering electrical stimulation at pre-programmed intervals (known as open-loop stimulation). Recent advances in machine learning and low-power integrated circuits have led to the emergence of personalized medical devices that monitor the user’s state and stimulate in response to measured biological activity (known as closed-loop stimulation). There are two key questions that require fundamental research to achieve breakthroughs in personalized devices: 1) What biomarkers and algorithms are best suited to detecting biological states (e.g. seizures in epilepsy)? and 2) What types of electrical stimuli are optimal for controlling these states? The answer to these questions can be explored in vitro using multielectrode array (MEA) systems that interface with biological tissue with reduced experimental complexity, better reproducibility, and fewer confounding variables present in whole organisms. However, existing MEA systems have functional limitations and closed-source designs that prevent researchers from developing improvements. This paper introduces OpenMEA, an open-source platform for closed-loop bioelectronics research. OpenMEA includes designs for the components necessary to build a benchtop in vitro laboratory, including electrophysiological recording and stimulation electronics, a microfluidic perfusion system, and physical designs for multielectrode arrays. The system is demonstrated with the electrical recording and stimulation of epileptogenic human and rodent brain slices. The aim of OpenMEA is to democratize bioelectronic research tools to accelerate the deployment of devices for the treatment of disorders and beyond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringFrench-language works237,207