MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308976659 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noac209.010

ANGI-11. RAB27 IS REQUIRED FOR REGULATING INTACT VASCULATURE IN GLIOBLASTOMA

2022· article· en· W4308976659 on OpenAlexaff
Lata Adnani, Brian Meehan, Janusz Rak

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular transport and secretion
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyAngiogenesisPathologyVascular permeabilityGliomaCancer researchMedicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rab27 is a GTPase involved in the biogenesis of extracellular vesicles (EVs) and cellular secretion pathway. Among two Rab27 isoforms (a and b) Rab27a has been identified in regulating angiogenesis during development and wound healing via VEGFR1. Here, we show that Rab27 plays a role in the development and stability of the brain vasculature including pathological angiogenesis in glioblastoma.. Thus, relative to wild-type C57bl/6 (WT) and double heterozygous Rab27a+/-;Rab27b+/- (dHET) mice, animals with Rab27a/b double knock-out (Rab27a/b-dKO) exhibit reduced microvascular density in brain cortices. Additionally, we also observed a reduction in permeability of Evans Blue in the Rab27 dKO cortices relative to controls. When neoangiogensis was induced following orthotopic inoculation of mouse glioma cells (GL261), a similar reduction and morphological anomalies were observed in the tumour vasculature relative to tumours established in control mice. Moreover, vascular permeability of tumours in Rab27a/b-dKO mice markedly exceeded that of similar tumours in wild type or heterozygous controls. Our results suggest Rab27a and Rab27b may play a critical role in ensuring stability of the vasculature under physiological conditions and in glioma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicCellular transport and secretionFrench-language works237,207