Improvement of treated spent pot lining reactivity in cementitious material by calcination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treating spent pot lining by the Low Caustic Leaching and Liming (LCLL) process creates an inert non-hazardous residue called LCLL Ash. Ground as a fine powder and calcined, LCLL Ash showed a pozzolanic behavior in cement. The effect of the calcination temperatures on LCLL Ash reactivity was studied by compressive strength activity index, Frattini tests, and RILEM R3 tests, followed by XRD analysis. When calcinating LCLL Ash at temperatures below 800 °C, no differences in reactivity were seen between calcined and non-calcined LCLL Ash. At 800 °C, the formation of nepheline caused an alkalis uptake, showing a slightly lower reactivity of LCLL Ash than cement at 112 days. Beyond 800 °C up to 1200 °C, calcined LCLL Ash manifested better amorphization of phases and increased reactivity, similar to cement at 112 days. Finally, neither delay on hydration nor hydroreactivity was observed with calcined LCLL Ash starting at 800 °C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".