MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309000845 · doi:10.1080/07060661.2022.2147586

MCT1 plays crucial roles in conidiation, lactate metabolism and pathogenicity in <i>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</i>

2022· article· en· W4309000845 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xuanzhu Zhao, Na Wang, Zhirui Ji, Zongshan Zhou, Junxiang Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsConidiationBiologyMutantMonocarboxylate transporterExtracellularCell biologyVirulenceTransporterMetabolismGlycolysisBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) play vital roles in carbon source assimilation, drug resistance and virulence. However, the underlying function of MCTs in fungal pathogenesis and development has not been investigated in detail. In this study, we identified and characterized the monocarboxylate transporter gene MCT1 of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, which is the causal agent of Glomerella leaf spot of apple. Mct1 is localized to the mitochondria and may mediate the uptake of lactate to the cell. However, MCT1 was constitutively expressed but showed an enhanced expression level in response to the presence of the extracellular lactate. Our results indicate that Mct1 plays a role in the metabolism of lactate. More importantly, the Δmct1 mutant showed significantly poor conidiation and a defect in host infection. Taken together, our studies provide evidence for Mct1 as a mitochondrial transmembrane protein mediating conidiation, the metabolism of lactate, and the pathogenicity of C. gloeosporioides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207