DDDR-34. RECURRENT RELA FUSION-POSITIVE EPENDYMOMA TREATED WITH VAL-083 UNDER EXPANDED ACCESS: A CASE REPORT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ependymoma is a relatively rare central nervous system tumor accounting for 2-9 % of all neuroepithelial tumors. RELA fusion-positive ependymoma is a subgroup associated with supratentorial location, higher WHO grade and worse prognosis. In addition, there is no standard systemic chemotherapy treatment for adults with recurrent disease. VAL-083 is a bi-functional DNA-targeting agent which rapidly induces inter-strand DNA cross-links at N7-guanine inducing double-strand breaks causing cell death and acts independent of MGMT DNA-repair in high-grade gliomas. We report a 40-year-old male who was initially diagnosed with a right parieto-occipital high-grade glioma, with no somatic mutations including IDH1/2 genes, and with unmethylated MGMT promoter status. He initially underwent gross total resection, followed by chemoradiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide for 12 cycles. Sixteen months later, he developed recurrent disease and had a second resection. Inter- and intragenic fusion analysis of tumor tissue revealed C11orf95-RELA fusion and the diagnosis of RELA fusion-positive ependymoma was established. The patient was not eligible to participate in any clinical trial and received VAL-083 under an expanded access program. He was then treated with VAL-083 (30 mg/m2 for 3 consecutive days every 21 days) and completed 12 cycles during a period of 9 months. No grade 3/4 adverse events such as thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, or lymphopenia were observed. His liver and renal functions were normal. No dose reduction was required. He also received levetiracetam, alprazolam and prochlorperazine, with no drug interactions. Steroid were not required. He has been under surveillance since completion of systemic treatment with VAL-083 and has remained radiologically stable, with no CSF dissemination, after 12 months. This case highlights that VAL-083 may be a treatment option for recurrent RELA fusion-positive ependymoma refractory to temozolomide-based regimens. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03138629. The treatment plans for this EAP patient were approved by MD Anderson Cancer Center IRB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".