MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309026629 · doi:10.1101/2022.11.11.516225

Single cell profiling reveals strain-specific differences in myeloid inflammatory potential in the rat liver

2022· preprint· en· W4309026629 on OpenAlexaff
Delaram Pouyabahar, Sai Chung, Olivia I. Pezzutti, Cátia T. Perciani, Xinle Wang, Xue‐Zhong Ma, Chao Jiang, Damra Camat, Trevor Chung, Manmeet Sekhon, Justin Manuel, Xuchun Chen, Ian D. McGilvray, Sonya A. MacParland, Gary D. Bader

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune cells in cancer
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiver transplantationBiologyTranscriptomeTransplantationMyeloidLiver diseasePhenotypeContext (archaeology)ImmunologyCancer researchPathologyMedicineGene expressionGeneInternal medicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Liver transplantation is currently the only treatment for end-stage liver disease and acute liver failure. Liver transplant rejection is among the most lethal complications of transplantation, and therapeutic development is limited by our lack of a comprehensive understanding of the cellular landscape of the liver. The laboratory rat ( Rattus norvegicus ), ideal in size as a model for surgical procedures, is a strong platform to study liver biology in the context of liver transplantation. Liver allograft rejection is known to be strain-specific in the rat model, although the transplantation is accepted without rejection in some strains, it leads to acute rejection in others. To shed light on the cellular landscape of the rat liver and build a foundation for strain comparison, we present a comprehensive single-cell transcriptomics map of the healthy rat liver of Lewis and Dark Agouti strains. Using a novel computational pipeline we developed to guide the detailed annotation of our rat liver atlas, we discovered that hepatic myeloid cells have strong Lewis and Dark Agouti strain-specific differences focused on inflammatory signaling pathways. We experimentally validated these strain-specific differences in myeloid inflammatory potential in vitro using intracellular cytokine staining. Our work provides the first examination of the multi-strain healthy rat liver by single cell transcriptomics and uncovers key insights into strain-specific differences in this valuable model animal. Summary The laboratory rat ( Rattus norvegicus ) is a standard model animal for orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplanting a liver from a Dark agouti (DA) to a Lewis (LEW) strain rat leads to transplant rejection and the reverse procedure leads to tolerance. Understanding this strain difference may help explain the cellular drivers of liver allograft rejection post-transplant. This study uses single-cell transcriptomics to better understand the complex cellular composition of the rat liver and unravels cellular and molecular sources of inter-strain hepatic variation. We generated single-cell transcriptomic maps of the livers of healthy DA and LEW rat strains and developed a novel, factor analysis-based bioinformatics pipeline to study data covariates, such as strain and batch. Using this approach, we discovered variations within hepatocyte and myeloid populations that explain how the states of these cells differ between strains in the healthy rat, which may explain why these strains respond differently to liver transplants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicImmune cells in cancerFrench-language works237,207