An Infant with Bilateral Keratitis: From Infectious to Genetic Diagnosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tyrosinemia Type II (TYRII) is a rare autosomal recessive inborn error of metabolism caused by deficiency of tyrosine aminotransferase (TAT), leading to hypertyrosinemia. TYRII patients often present in the first year of life with ocular and cutaneous findings, including corneal ulcers, pseudodendritic keratitis, and palmoplantar hyperkeratosis. The corneal involvement is often mistaken for herpes simplex virus (HSV) keratitis, which is a much commoner condition. CASE REPORT A previously healthy 10-month-old male infant was referred to Ophthalmology for acute onset photophobia. Bilateral dendritiform corneal lesions raised the suspicion for herpetic keratitis. Additionally, a papular, crusted lesion was found on his thumb after a few days of hospitalization, also raising concerns about HSV. The patient's clinical condition seemed to improve under intravenous acyclovir and supportive treatment. A conjunctival swab and crusted lesion on the thumb were tested for HSV using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, and both were negative. Nevertheless, given the clinical presentation and the favorable course of signs and symptoms, hospital discharge was planned with oral acyclovir. It was halted by an alternative diagnosis of autosomal recessive inborn error of metabolism, tyrosinemia type II, confirmed by elevated plasma tyrosine level and later by molecular analysis requested as a confirmatory investigation by the genetics medical team. CONCLUSIONS The corneal involvement in TYRII is often mistaken for HSV keratitis, and clinical course alone should not halt further investigations to rule out TYRII. Clinicians should suspect TYRII clinically when its characteristic ocular dendritiform lesions are present, namely in infancy or early childhood, and even in the absence of its typical cutaneous palmoplantar hyperkeratosis plaques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".