MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309030160 · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2022.113335

Paddy rice methane emissions across Monsoon Asia

2022· article· en· W4309030160 on OpenAlexaff
Zutao Ouyang, Robert B. Jackson, Gavin McNicol, Etienne Fluet‐Chouinard, Benjamin R. K. Runkle, Dario Papale, Sara Knox, Sarah Cooley, Kyle Delwiche, Sarah Féron, Jeremy Irvin, Avni Malhotra, Muhammad Muddasir, Simone Sabbatini, Ma. Carmelita Alberto, Alessandro Cescatti, Chi‐Ling Chen, Jinwei Dong, B. Fong, Haiqiang Guo, Hao Lu, Hiroki Iwata, Qingyu Jia, Weimin Ju, Minseok Kang, Hong Li, Joon Kim, Michele L. Reba, A. K. Nayak, Débora Regina Roberti, Youngryel Ryu, Chinmaya Kumar Swain, Ben‐Jei Tsuang, Xiangming Xiao, Wenping Yuan, Geli Zhang, Yongguang Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing of Environment · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityDivision of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport SystemsHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeU.S. Geological SurveyMinistry of Agriculture, Forestry and FisheriesEuropean CommissionChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesRural Development AdministrationMinistry of EnvironmentNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Research FoundationMichigan State UniversityNational Research Foundation of KoreaGordon and Betty Moore FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceEddy covariancePaddy fieldMonsoonGreenhouse gasMethaneAtmospheric sciencesClimatologyEcosystemAgronomyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although rice cultivation is one of the most important agricultural sources of methane (CH4) and contributes ∼8% of total global anthropogenic emissions, large discrepancies remain among estimates of global CH4 emissions from rice cultivation (ranging from 18 to 115 Tg CH4 yr−1) due to a lack of observational constraints. The spatial distribution of paddy-rice emissions has been assessed at regional-to-global scales by bottom-up inventories and land surface models over coarse spatial resolution (e.g., > 0.5°) or spatial units (e.g., agro-ecological zones). However, high-resolution CH4 flux estimates capable of capturing the effects of local climate and management practices on emissions, as well as replicating in situ data, remain challenging to produce because of the scarcity of high-resolution maps of paddy-rice and insufficient understanding of CH4 predictors. Here, we combine paddy-rice methane-flux data from 23 global eddy covariance sites and MODIS remote sensing data with machine learning to 1) evaluate data-driven model performance and variable importance for predicting rice CH4 fluxes; and 2) produce gridded up-scaling estimates of rice CH4 emissions at 5000-m resolution across Monsoon Asia, where ∼87% of global rice area is cultivated and ∼ 90% of global rice production occurs. Our random-forest model achieved Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency values of 0.59 and 0.69 for 8-day CH4 fluxes and site mean CH4 fluxes respectively, with land surface temperature, biomass and water-availability-related indices as the most important predictors. We estimate the average annual (winter fallow season excluded) paddy rice CH4 emissions throughout Monsoon Asia to be 20.6 ± 1.1 Tg yr−1 for 2001–2015, which is at the lower range of previous inventory-based estimates (20–32 CH4 Tg yr−1). Our estimates also suggest that CH4 emissions from paddy rice in this region have been declining from 2007 through 2015 following declines in both paddy-rice growing area and emission rates per unit area, suggesting that CH4 emissions from paddy rice in Monsoon Asia have likely not contributed to the renewed growth of atmospheric CH4 in recent years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote Sensing of EnvironmentSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207