MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309036893 · doi:10.13109/9783666370991

Jahrbuch des Dubnow-Instituts /Dubnow Institute Yearbook XVIII 2019

2022· book· de· W4309036893 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueVandenhoeck & Ruprecht eBooks · 2022
Typebook
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGerman legal, social, and political studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFranz Rosenzweig Minerva Research Center for German-Jewish Literature and Cultural History, Hebrew University of JerusalemSzegedi TudományegyetemUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisUniversität zu KölnFreie Universität BerlinUniversity College DublinHebrew University of JerusalemBar-Ilan UniversityYork UniversityWestern Washington University
KeywordsYearbookGermanPolitical scienceLawsuitHistoryEconomic historyHumanitiesArtLibrary scienceLawVisual artsArchaeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Das Jahrbuch 2019 des Dubnow-Instituts umfasst zwei Schwerpunkte: Der erste widmet sich Jüdinnen und Juden im Nachkriegseuropa und thematisiert akteurszentriert die vielfältigen Herausforderungen, die Holocaustüberlebende beim Aufbau einer neuen Existenz zu bewältigen hatten. Der zweite Schwerpunkt untersucht vor dem Hintergrund des Kalten Krieges, seinem lokalen Nachhall in den Diktaturen Lateinamerikas und des das Zeitgeschehen charakterisierenden Begriffspaars "Lucha y Libertad" (Kampf und Freiheit) die Überlagerung von prospektiver und errungener Freiheit. Der Allgemeine Teil und die Rubriken enthalten Beiträge zur Politik-, Rechts- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte sowie zu literatur-, sprach- und quellenhistorischen Fragen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.008
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVandenhoeck & Ruprecht eBooksSame topicGerman legal, social, and political studiesFrench-language works237,207