MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309046732 · doi:10.1093/forestry/cpac047

Mechanical scarification can reduce competitive traits of boreal ericaceous shrubs and improve nutritional site quality

2022· article· en· W4309046732 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Krista Reicis, Robert L. Bradley, Gilles Joanisse, Nelson Thiffault, Dalton Scott, William F. J. Parsons

Bibliographic record

VenueForestry An International Journal of Forest Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec)Cegep de Sainte FoyUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsScarificationEricaceaeForest floorGeographyBiologyHorticultureBotanyForestryEcologyEcosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ericaceous shrubs often interfere with the growth of black spruce seedlings on regenerating forest sites in Eastern Canada. Mechanical site preparation such as scarification may improve this situation, but it is uncertain whether this is solely due to a reduction in direct competition from the shrubs, or also from a sustained improvement in nutritional site quality. We sampled experimental plots in two boreal climate regions (i.e. warmer-drier Abitibi vs. cooler-wetter Côte-Nord) where scarification, performed 18 years earlier, had increased the growth of black spruce relative to non-scarified plots. Trees of scarified plots had closed the canopy more than trees of non-scarified plots in Côte-Nord, but not in Abitibi. Total ground cover of ericaceous shrubs was lower in scarified plots at both sites, the main species being Kalmia angustifolia (i.e. Kalmia) in Abitibi and Rhododendron groenlandicum (i.e. Labrador tea) in Côte-Nord. Scarified plots at both sites had significantly shorter current-year ericaceous rhizomes than non-scarified plots, but the difference between treatments was significantly greater in Côte-Nord than in Abitibi. In Côte-Nord, ericaceous shrubs on scarified plots had a lower specific rhizome mass, higher specific leaf area, lower tannin and higher N concentrations in leaves and litter, and lower N use efficiency than on non-scarified plots. By comparison, scarification in Abitibi affected only one foliar property, namely a reduction in the C:N ratio of Kalmia leaf litter. Forest floor N mineralization rates and black spruce needle N concentrations were higher in scarified than non-scarified plots across both sites. Taken collectively, results suggest that mechanical scarification on ericaceous shrub-dominated cutovers can reduce competitive traits of boreal ericaceous shrubs and improve nutritional site quality, especially in cooler-wetter climates. Highlights

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForestry An International Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207