Masticator space abscess following intramuscular stimulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A male in his 50s presented to the hospital with preauricular tenderness, trismus and dysphagia. He had intramuscular stimulation of his left temporomandibular joint region performed 4 days prior and described worsening pain and swelling since. A CT scan revealed an abscess involving the left masticator space. Incision and drainage of the abscess was performed, and the patient was discharged home on oral antibiotics 11 days later. This is the first report of masticatory space abscess following intramuscular stimulation of the temporomandibular joint area. Acupuncture and intramuscular stimulation are common complementary medicine therapies that are generally considered safe; however, adverse events such as deep neck space infection have been reported in the literature. Current regulation of training requirements and licensure for needling therapies is highly variable. Standardisation of training and practice guidelines may help mitigate the risk of adverse events related to needling therapies in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".