MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309084546 · doi:10.5206/cieeci.v51i1.14220

Challenges of South Asian and Chinese International Students: Becoming Anchored in Networks of Support

2022· article· en· W4309084546 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Nancy Mandell, Janice Phonepraseuth, Jana Borras, Larry Lam

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative and International Education · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Student and Expatriate Challenges
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFutures contractPublic relationsWork (physics)International educationSocial network (sociolinguistics)SociologyChinaPolitical scienceHigher educationBusinessSocial mediaEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When coming to Canada to pursue post-secondary education, international students experience academic, financial, employment, and social and emotional challenges. Drawing on social network studies and studies of social anchoring, twenty-three in-depth interviews with South Asian and Chinese international students reveal the ways they navigate these issues in their post-secondary school environments. We find that international students work hard to establish social networks by making new connections at school, and students turn to their institutional networks for assistance. However, institutional networks alone are inadequate, and international students must also find support and advice through their family and community networks. We conclude that having strong institutional, family, and community networks are crucial to the social anchoring of international students in Canadian society. Social networks mitigate the challenges that international students encounter as they build their futures through post-secondary education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComparative and International EducationSame topicInternational Student and Expatriate ChallengesFrench-language works237,207