MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309088944 · doi:10.51657/ric.v6i2.51468

La narration iconotextuelle au service de l’activité de création. Dispositif didactique et démarche sémiotique pour rendre l’élève cré-acteur·rice de ses apprentissages.

2022· article· fr· W4309088944 on OpenAlex
Maud Lebreton, Rachel Attanasio

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale du CRIRES innover dans la tradition de Vygotsky · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research was conducted in three cycle 1 classes in the canton of Vaud in Switzerland. Based on the creative process of Wallas (2003) and the identified factors of creativity (Lubart, 2003), it proposes to put the posture of creator in a social semiotic perspective by using the multimodal narration of the album as a mediating object. The results of this research make it possible to refine the initial process by invoking, in particular, astonishment (Thiévenaz, 2017), inquiry (Dewey, 1993) and Vygotsky's symbolic play (1978). The creative act, by being anchored in the individual's reality, generates experiential learning in and for him, by the group and for the group (Sullivan, 2017). As pedagogical support of choice, notably because of the richness of the offer, the affective dimension of the images and the narration, the album is a composite object whose semiotic complexity forces a process of metaphorical meaning-making described as highly creative (Kress, 2010). Thus, the organizing principle of each modality present allows for the establishment of relationships which, when deepened by the students' actions, become the basis for learning beyond the strict framework of the discipline and developing skills that are both productive and constructive (Pastré, 2006). As the motivation of the sign-maker depends on his or her interests (Kress, 2010), participation in a narrative that has to find its conclusion places the student in the position of a creator-actor of his or her learning. The multimodal medium serves here as a material for (re)conceptualisation in which the transmediation (Suhor, 1984, cited in Sullivan, 2017) specific to the composite nature of the medium is put at the service of the creator's posture. The object produced can then take an active role in the construction of meaning (Bowker & Star, 2000), making the process a transformative practice (Conne, 2008) for the learner who critically co-constructs her/his learning (The New London Group, 1996; Sullivan, 2017). Referring back to social semiotics, learning is here considered primarily as a situated meaning-making process (Budach, 2018; Mottier Lopez, 2016) from an anthropological perspective of education (Ingold, 2018).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it