A Shuttle‐Free Solid‐State Cu−Li Battery Based on a Sandwich‐Structured Electrolyte
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cu−Li batteries leveraging the two‐electron redox property of Cu can offer high energy density and low cost. However, Cu−Li batteries are plagued by limited solubility and a shuttle effect of Cu ions in traditional electrolytes, which leads to low energy density and poor cycling stability. In this work, we rationally design a solid‐state sandwich electrolyte for solid‐state Cu−Li batteries, in which a deep‐eutectic‐solvent gel with high Cu‐ion solubility is devised as a Cu‐ion reservoir while a ceramic Li 1.4 Al 0.4 Ti 1.6 (PO 4 ) 3 interlayer is used to block Cu‐ion crossover. Because of the high ionic conductivity (0.55 mS cm −1 at 25 °C), wide electrochemical window (>4.5 V vs. Li + /Li), and high Cu ion solubility of solid‐state sandwich electrolyte, a solid‐state Cu−Li battery demonstrates a high energy density of 1 485 Wh kg Cu −1 and long‐term cyclability with 97 % capacity retention over 120 cycles. The present study lays the groundwork for future research into low‐cost solid‐state Cu−Li batteries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".