A Dimension-Reduced Artificial Neural Network Model for the Cell Voltage Consistency Prediction of a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stack
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The voltage consistency of hundreds of cells in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack significantly influences the stack’s performance and lifetime. Using the physics-based model to estimate the cell voltage consistency is highly challenging due to the massive calculation efforts and the complicated fuel cell designs. In this research, an artificial neural network (ANN) model is developed to efficiently predict the cell voltage distribution and the consistency of a commercial-size fuel cell stack. To balance the computation efficiency and accuracy, a dimension-reduced method is proposed with different output-grouping strategies to optimize the ANN structure based on the experiment test of a 100-cell stack. The model’s training time falls nonlinearly from 16 min to 6 s with the output neuron number decreasing from 100 to 5, while the model can still predict the cell voltage distribution trends. With the proposed model, the stack’s cell voltage distributions could be reproduced with significantly lowered computation time, which is beneficial to evaluate the fuel cell status and optimize the control strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".