MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309133108 · doi:10.1017/pasa.2022.50

WALLABY pilot survey: Public release of H <scp>i</scp> data for almost 600 galaxies from phase 1 of ASKAP pilot observations

2022· article· en· W4309133108 on OpenAlexafffund
T. Westmeier, Nathan Deg, Kristine Spekkens, T. Reynolds, Ao Shen, Suzanne Gaudet, S. Goliath, Marie Huynh, P. Venkataraman, X. Lin, T. O’Beirne, Barbara Catinella, L. Cortese, Helga Dénes, Ahmed Elagali, Bi‐Qing For, G. I. G. Józsa, Cullan Howlett, J. M. van der Hulst, Russell J. Jurek, P. Kamphuis, V. A. Kilborn, D. Kleiner, B. Koribalski, K. Lee-Waddell, C. Murugeshan, J. Rhee, P. Serra, Li Shao, L. Staveley‐Smith, Jing Wang, O. Ivy Wong, M. A. Zwaan, J. R. Allison, C. S. Anderson, Lewis Ball, Douglas C.‐J. Bock, David Brodrick, John D. Bunton, F. R. Cooray, N. Gupta, Douglas B. Hayman, E. K. Mahony, Vanessa A. Moss, A. Ng, Sarah E. Pearce, Wasim Raja, Daniel N. Roxby, M. A. Voronkov, K Warhurst, H. M. Courtois, Khaled Said

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsRoyal Military College of CanadaQueen's University
FundersGovernment of Western AustraliaAustralian GovernmentCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationNational Research Council CanadaNational Radio Astronomy ObservatoryScience and Industry Endowment Fund
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsRedshiftGalaxySkyAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present WALLABY pilot data release 1, the first public release of H i pilot survey data from the Wide-field ASKAP L-band Legacy All-sky Blind Survey (WALLABY) on the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder. Phase 1 of the WALLABY pilot survey targeted three $60\,\mathrm{deg}^{2}$ regions on the sky in the direction of the Hydra and Norma galaxy clusters and the NGC 4636 galaxy group, covering the redshift range of $z \lesssim 0.08$ . The source catalogue, images and spectra of nearly 600 extragalactic H i detections and kinematic models for 109 spatially resolved galaxies are available. As the pilot survey targeted regions containing nearby group and cluster environments, the median redshift of the sample of $z \approx 0.014$ is relatively low compared to the full WALLABY survey. The median galaxy H i mass is $2.3 \times 10^{9}\,{\rm M}_{{\odot}}$ . The target noise level of $1.6\,\mathrm{mJy}$ per 30 ′′ beam and $18.5\,\mathrm{kHz}$ channel translates into a $5 \sigma$ H i mass sensitivity for point sources of about $5.2 \times 10^{8} \, (D_{\rm L} / \mathrm{100\,Mpc})^{2} \, {\rm M}_{{\odot}}$ across 50 spectral channels ( ${\approx} 200\,\mathrm{km \, s}^{-1}$ ) and a $5 \sigma$ H i column density sensitivity of about $8.6 \times 10^{19} \, (1 + z)^{4}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$ across 5 channels ( ${\approx} 20\,\mathrm{km \, s}^{-1}$ ) for emission filling the 30 ′′ beam. As expected for a pilot survey, several technical issues and artefacts are still affecting the data quality. Most notably, there are systematic flux errors of up to several 10% caused by uncertainties about the exact size and shape of each of the primary beams as well as the presence of sidelobes due to the finite deconvolution threshold. In addition, artefacts such as residual continuum emission and bandpass ripples have affected some of the data. The pilot survey has been highly successful in uncovering such technical problems, most of which are expected to be addressed and rectified before the start of the full WALLABY survey.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.921

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications of the Astronomical Society of AustraliaSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207