Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity production by mono-crystalline solar systems: a case study in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Photovoltaic (PV) system is widely recognized as one of the cleanest technologies for electricity production, which transforms solar energy into electrical energy. However, there are considerable amounts of emissions during its life cycle. In this study, life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to evaluate the environmental and human health impacts of PV electricity production in Canada. The PV potential varies considerably among the provinces, with higher values in Manitoba (MB), Saskatchewan (SK), Alberta (AB), and southern Ontario (ON). A grid-connected slanted-roof mono-crystalline silicon (mono-Si) PV system with a capacity of 3 kWp (the peak power of the system in kilowatts) in Toronto, Ontario, was considered as the case study system. Ten impact categories were considered including (1) acidification, (2) carcinogenic, (3) ecotoxicity, (4) eutrophication, (5) fossil fuel depletion, (6) global warming, (7) non-carcinogenic, (8) ozone depletion, (9) respiratory effects, and (10) smog. Among the four components of the PV system, i.e., mono-Si panel, mounting system, inverter, and electric installation, the mono-Si panel production was the highest contributor in seven out of ten impact categories, including acidification (68%), eutrophication (60%), fossil fuel depletion (81%), global warming (77%), ozone depletion (88%), respiratory effects (74%), and smog (70%). For the other three processes, the electric installation contributed most to ecotoxicity at 58%, followed by the mounting system in the carcinogenic category (29%), and the inverter in the non-carcinogenic category (31%). By normalizing the impacts based on the reference scores in Canada, it was found that the ecotoxicity and carcinogenic categories had dominant contributions to the overall impact by 53% and 42%, respectively. The global warming potential impact was estimated as 79 gr CO2 eq /kWh, which is close to the mean value of 79.5 gr CO2 eq /kWh, reported in the literature. The sensitivity analysis indicated that a 10% increase in the panel and mounting system area will increase the ozone depletion and carcinogenic categories by 8.1% and 2.8%, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".