MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4309164705 · doi:10.1111/nyas.14915

Antibodies as drugs—a Keystone Symposia report

2022· article· en· W4309164705 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Cable, Erica Ollmann Saphire, Adrian Hayday, Timothy D. Wiltshire, Jarrod J. Mousa, David P. Humphreys, Esther C.W. Breij, Pierre Bruhns, Matteo Broketa, Genta Furuya, Blake M. Hauser, Matthieu Mahévas, Andrea Carfı́, Tineke Cantaert, Peter D. Kwong, Prabhanshu Tripathi, Jonathan H. Davis, Neil Brewis, Bruce A. Keyt, Felix L. Fennemann, Vincent Dussupt, Aravind Sivasubramanian, Philip M. Kim, Reda Rawi, Eve Richardson, Daniel Leventhal, Rachael M. Wolters, Cecile Geuijen, Matthew A. Sleeman, Niccolò Pengo, Francesca R. Donnellan

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research CentreUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institute of General Medical SciencesMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthFrancis Crick InstituteWellcome TrustHoward Hughes Medical Institute
KeywordsBispecific antibodyAntibodyMedicineImmunologyMonoclonal antibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Therapeutic antibodies have broad indications across diverse disease states, such as oncology, autoimmune diseases, and infectious diseases. New research continues to identify antibodies with therapeutic potential as well as methods to improve upon endogenous antibodies and to design antibodies de novo. On April 27-30, 2022, experts in antibody research across academia and industry met for the Keystone symposium "Antibodies as Drugs" to present the state-of-the-art in antibody therapeutics, repertoires and deep learning, bispecific antibodies, and engineering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0050.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences→Same topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research→French-language works237,207→