MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4309165768 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.220954

Frailty in Inflammatory Arthritis: A Fragile Construct

2022· editorial· en· W4309165768 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marloes van Onna, Annelies Boonen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRheumatologyVulnerability (computing)ArthritisStressorGerontologyInternal medicinePopulationInflammatory arthritisConstruct (python library)Clinical psychologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the exponential growth of the aging population, the concept of frailty cannot be ignored anymore in the field of rheumatology.1 Frailty is a common geriatric syndrome and although no consensus definition has been developed, frailty is generally characterized as a "decline in functioning across multiple organs systems accompanied by an increased vulnerability to stressors."2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0180.033
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicFrailty in Older Adults→French-language works237,207→