MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract A031: Proteogenomic analysis of the PDAC epithelium reveals tissue markers of subtype identity and biology

2022· article· en· W4309189468 on OpenAlexaff
Barbara T. Grünwald, Foram Vyas, Michael J. Geuenich, Nathan Chan, Ricardo González, Kazeera Aliar, Niklas Krebs, Antoine Devisme, Geoffroy Andrieux, Gun Ho Jang, Grainne M. O’Kane, Julie M. Wilson, Jennifer J. Knox, Faiyaz Notta, Kieran R. Campbell, Steven Gallinger, Melanie Boerries, Sandra E. Fischer, Thomas Kislinger, Rama Khokha

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of WaterlooSinai Health SystemPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyStromal cellTranscriptomeProteomicsCancer researchGene expression profilingProteogenomicsGeneComputational biologyGene expressionBioinformaticsGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Effective treatments for Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remain an urgent need. Integration of molecular PDAC subtypes into clinical trials could enable translational insights into how we might refine existing and emerging therapies to improve treatment options, yet this requires robust clinically suitable marker genes and a better understanding of subtype-related biology. Here, we deeply profiled the molecular composition of human PDAC epithelia and assessed differentially expressed genes for their ability to discriminate between subtypes and mirror their key biological traits. Using well-annotated resected & advanced biospecimens, we mapped the stromal and epithelial landscapes of PDAC subtypes by combining compartment-specific transcriptomics and proteomics with quantitative image analysis of a 42-marker IHC panel and single cell RNA sequencing analyses. The integrated profiling yielded a shortlist of 30 genes that were differentially expressed at both transcriptomic and proteomic levels, and across primary and metastatic sites. These were then scrutinized for their suitability as potential single gene subtype markers through association with subtype-related epithelial and stromal biology and clinical outcomes, and via practical considerations such as immunohistochemical staining quality and cell type-specific expression patterns. Since PDAC subtypes frequently co-occur intratumorally, we furthermore assessed complementarity of different subtype marker combinations and tested association of individual markers with regional subtype biology. Annexin A8 emerged as strong IHC-suitable marker gene of the basal/squamous subtype, that exhibited prognostic and predictive value. Concordantly, Annexin A8 expression was highly correlated with TP63, a master transcription factor for the squamous subtype, and CK5, a well-established basal cell marker. In tissue stains and single cell RNAseq data, Annexin A8 specifically marked malignant epithelia but was absent from adjacent normal acini and stroma cell populations. Annexin A8 expression in PDAC epithelia was spatially distinct from the known classical subtype biomarker GATA6, as well as Claudin 18, which was the top classical/pancreatic progenitor marker gene in our integrated multiOMIC analysis. Furthermore, Annexin A8high tumors as well as Annexin A8high intratumoral regions both recapitulated key biological traits of the basal-like/squamous PDAC subtype, such as increased EMT marker expression, proliferation, hypoxia, macrophage attraction and T cell repulsion. In conclusion, integrated proteogenomic characterization of PDAC subtypes and their tissue features uncovers complementary subtype marker pairs with clinical potential and provides insights into subtype-specific biology with implications in the development of future therapeutic approaches tailored to each PDAC subtype. Citation Format: Barbara T. Grünwald, Foram Vyas, Michael Geuenich, Nathan Chan, Ricardo Gonzalez, Kazeera Aliar, Niklas Krebs, Antoine Devisme, Geoffroy Andrieux, Gun Ho Jang, Grainne O'Kane, Julie Wilson, Jennifer Knox, Faiyaz Notta, Kieran Campbell, Steven Gallinger, Melanie Boerries, Sandra Fischer, Thomas Kislinger, Rama Khokha. Proteogenomic analysis of the PDAC epithelium reveals tissue markers of subtype identity and biology [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer; 2022 Sep 13-16; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(22 Suppl):Abstract nr A031.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research→French-language works237,207→