MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A036: Plasma extracellular RNA for the detection of pancreatic cancer

2022· article· en· W4309190654 on OpenAlexaff
Linsey Gong, Yuanchang Fang, Karen Ng, Gun Ho Jang, Amy X. Zhang, Julie M. Wilson, Stephanie Ramotar, Jennifer J. Knox, Grainne M. O’Kane, Steven Gallinger, Hansen He, Faiyaz Notta

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicExtracellular vesicles in disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubtypingTranscriptomePancreatic cancerLiquid biopsyGeneRNAGene expression profilingCancerCancer researchMedicineGene expressionBiologyOncologyInternal medicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is expected to become the second leading cause of cancer-related death by 2030. Patients are often diagnosed at the metastatic stage, at which point treatments are limited and have non-uniform efficacy in patients. Advances in transcriptomic subtyping of tumor tissue can segregate patients into two broad subtypes, Classical and Basal-like, which are predictive of survival and response to first-line chemotherapy. However, tumor tissue is often difficult or impossible to obtain, particularly in patients with advanced disease, hindering the clinical implementation of transcriptomic subtyping. Profiling the extracellular RNA (exRNA) content in plasma provides an opportunity for a non-invasive readout of the tumor transcriptome. Here, we aim to establish the feasibility of liquid biopsy—particularly, plasma exRNA-profiling—for the diagnosis and subtyping of PDA. Extracellular vesicle (EV) encapsulated exRNA was isolated from 1mL of frozen plasma collected between 2017-2020 from a pilot cohort of 8 patients with stage III-IV PDA and processed alongside plasma from 6 healthy volunteers. UMI-tagged libraries were constructed from low-input exRNA to generate sequencing data. Gene body coverage analysis indicated that exRNAs consisted of intact full-length transcripts. Of these transcripts, we found that there was a median of 34,975 genes encoded by exRNAs, deriving mostly from protein-coding regions. Most genes captured by exRNA sequencing had low expression. Comparing between groups, we detected a significantly greater number of genes and novel splicing junctions in PDA patients. Of the cancer-specific transcripts, differential expression analysis revealed significant upregulation of membrane organelle and RNA-processing related pathways. PDA exRNA profiles did not completely recapitulate the bulk tumor transcriptome, suggesting specific mechanisms for EV encapsulation of RNAs and exRNA release. To classify tumor subtypes by plasma exRNA sequencing, we identified an exRNA-specific gene panel from bulk tumor transcriptome signatures. Using this gene panel, tumor subtype was correctly inferred from 6/7 PDA patients. A combined gene panel derived from all tumor-associated exRNA signatures distinguished 7/8 PDA patients from healthy controls. In conclusion, plasma exRNA recapitulated elements of the tumor transcriptome and has utility in PDA diagnosis. The establishment of diagnostic markers will be further investigated in the expanded study cohort comprised of 91 unique stage III-IV PDA donors with plasma collected at baseline, 150 stage III-IV PDA donors with plasma banked at timepoints throughout chemotherapy treatment, and 100 age- and sex-matched non-PDA controls donors. Leveraging the study cohort, future work will also investigate plasma exRNA signatures as prognostic markers to predict treatment outcomes and monitor treatment responses in patients with advanced PDA. Citation Format: Linsey Gong, Ling Xi, Yuanchang Fang, Karen Ng, Gun Ho Jang, Amy X. Zhang, Julie M. Wilson, Stephanie Ramotar, Jennifer J. Knox, Grainne M. O'Kane, Steven Gallinger, Hansen H. He, Faiyaz Notta. Plasma extracellular RNA for the detection of pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer; 2022 Sep 13-16; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(22 Suppl):Abstract nr A036.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicExtracellular vesicles in diseaseFrench-language works237,207