HeatViT: Hardware-Efficient Adaptive Token Pruning for Vision Transformers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While vision transformers (ViTs) have continuously achieved new milestones in the field of computer vision, their sophisticated network architectures with high computation and memory costs have impeded their deployment on resource-limited edge devices. In this paper, we propose a hardware-efficient image-adaptive token pruning framework called HeatViT for efficient yet accurate ViT acceleration on embedded FPGAs. By analyzing the inherent computational patterns in ViTs, we first design an effective attention-based multi-head token selector, which can be progressively inserted before transformer blocks to dynamically identify and consolidate the non-informative tokens from input images. Moreover, we implement the token selector on hardware by adding miniature control logic to heavily reuse existing hardware components built for the backbone ViT. To improve the hardware efficiency, we further employ 8-bit fixed-point quantization, and propose polynomial approximations with regularization effect on quantization error for the frequently used nonlinear functions in ViTs. Finally, we propose a latency-aware multi-stage training strategy to determine the transformer blocks for inserting token selectors and optimize the desired (average) pruning rates for inserted token selectors, in order to improve both the model accuracy and inference latency on hardware. Compared to existing ViT pruning studies, under the similar computation cost, HeatViT can achieve 0.7%$\sim$8.9% higher accuracy; while under the similar model accuracy, HeatViT can achieve more than 28.4%$\sim$65.3% computation reduction, for various widely used ViTs, including DeiT-T, DeiT-S, DeiT-B, LV-ViT-S, and LV-ViT-M, on the ImageNet dataset. Compared to the baseline hardware accelerator, our implementations of HeatViT on the Xilinx ZCU102 FPGA achieve 3.46$\times$$\sim$4.89$\times$ speedup.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".