MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Generalizable DNN based multi-material Hysteresis Modelling

2022· article· en· W4309226941 on OpenAlexaff
Saikou Cesay, Paul Teng, Ruoli Wang, Haupeng Yue, Arbaaz Khan, David A. Lowther

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE 20th Biennial Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation (CEFC) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformerComputer scienceActuatorRepresentation (politics)Finite element methodPoint (geometry)HysteresisOperating pointMagnetic hysteresisElectronic engineeringControl engineeringMechanical engineeringMagnetizationVoltageElectrical engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceStructural engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This The effective representation of material properties is fundamental to the simulation of electromagnetic devices such as electrical machines, actuators, sensors, transformers, etc. However, the actual operating point of a material is dependent both on position within the device and the excitation. Every point in an electrical machine can be operating on a different part of the magnetization curve. To determine performance parameters such as the efficiency of the machine, the hysteretic behavior of the material is crucial, and the representation used can impact the performance of a simulation code. In this paper, the use of deep learning methods is proposed to reduce the computational effort needed to implement hysteresis in a finite element based simulation system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE 20th Biennial Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation (CEFC)Same topicMagnetic Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207