MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309244045 · doi:10.5334/gh.1167

Correction: Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes among Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19: Findings from the World Heart Federation COVID-19 Study

2022· erratum· en· W4309244045 on OpenAlexaff
Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Kavita Singh, Dimple Kondal, Lana Raspail, Bishav Mohan, Toru Kato, Nizal Sarrafzadegan, Shamim Hayder Talukder, Shahin Akter, Mohammad Robed Amin, Fastone Goma, Juan Esteban Gómez‐Mesa, Ntobeko Ntusi, Francisca Inofomoh, Surender Deora, Evgenii Philippov, Alla Svarovskaya, А. О. Конради, Aurelio Puentes, Okechukwu S. Ogah, Bojan Stanetić, Aurora Felice Castro Issa, Friedrich Thienemann, Dafsah Arifa Juzar, Ezequiel Zaidel, Sana Sheikh, Dike Ojji, Carolyn S.P. Lam, Junbo Ge, Amitava Banerjee, L. Kristin Newby, Antônio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro, Samuel S. Gidding, Fausto J. Pinto, Pablo Perel, Karen Sliwa

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Heart · 2022
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersFogarty International CenterNational Institutes of HealthMedical Research CouncilFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas GeraisConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Internal medicineCardiologyDiseaseVirologyOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article details a correction to: Prabhakaran D, Singh K, Kondal D, Raspail L, Mohan B, Kato T, et al. Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes among Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19: Findings from the World Heart Federation COVID-19 Study. <em>Global Heart</em>. 2022; 17(1): 40. DOI: <a href="http://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1128" target="_blank">http://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1128</a>.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.157
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.157
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0060.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.032

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal HeartSame topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207