MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309244178 · doi:10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac045

May Measurement Month: results of 12 national blood pressure screening programmes between 2017 and 2019

2022· article· en· W4309244178 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal Supplements · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences
FundersMedical Research CouncilServierOmron HealthcareInternational Society of Hypertension
KeywordsMedicineBlood pressureIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first May Measurement Month (MMM) campaign, a global blood pressure (BP) screening programme, began
\nin 2017 as an initiative of the International Society of Hypertension.1 Two subsequent annual campaigns have
\nalso been completed in consecutive years2,3 and having had to defer activities due to the COVID-19 pandemic
\nin 2020 the fourth campaign was run in 2021, the results of which are currently in press. Since its initiation in
\n2017, volunteers from more than 100 countries have participated.
\nThe aims of MMM have remained consistent from the start—to raise awareness of the importance of the measurement of BP at the individual and population level and to provide a temporary pragmatic solution to
\nthe shortfall in BP screening programmes in countries around the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it