MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309245051 · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abq3925

The Winchcombe meteorite, a unique and pristine witness from the outer solar system

2022· article· en· W4309245051 on OpenAlexaff
A. J. King, Luke Daly, James B. Rowe, K. H. Joy, R. C. Greenwood, Hadrien A. R. Devillepoix, Martin D. Suttle, Q. H. S. Chan, S. S. Russell, H. C. Bates, J. F. J. Bryson, P. L. Clay, Denis Vida, Martin Lee, Áine O’Brien, L. J. Hallis, N. R. Stephen, Romain Tartèse, Eleanor K. Sansom, M. C. Towner, Martin Cupák, Patrick Shober, P. A. Bland, Ross Findlay, I. A. Franchi, A. B. Verchovsky, F. A. J. Abernethy, M. M. Grady, Cameron J. Floyd, Matthias Van Ginneken, J. C. Bridges, L. J. Hicks, R. H. Jones, Jennifer T. Mitchell, M. J. Genge, Laura E. Jenkins, Pierre‐Etienne Martin, Mark A. Sephton, Jonathan S. Watson, T. Salge, K. A. Shirley, R. J. Curtis, T. Warren, Neil E. Bowles, Finlay M. Stuart, Luigia Di Nicola, Domokos Györe, Adrian J. Boyce, Kathryn M. M. Shaw, Tim Elliott, Robert C. Steele, Pavel P. Povinec, M. Laubenstein, D.C.W. Sanderson, A.J. Cresswell, A. J. T. Jull, I. Sýkora, Sanjana Sridhar, R. J. Harrison, Francesca M. Willcocks, Catherine S. Harrison, Daniel Hallatt, P. J. Wozniakiewicz, M. J. Burchell, Luke S. Alesbrook, Aishling Dignam, N. V. Almeida, C. L. Smith, Brett Clark, Emma Humphreys‐Williams, P. F. Schofield, Luke T. Cornwell, Vassilia Spathis, Geraint Morgan, Mark J. Perkins, Richard Kacerek, Peter Campbell‐Burns, F. Colas, B. Zanda, Pierre Vernazza, Sylvain Bouley, Simon Jeanne, Mike Hankey, G. S. Collins, J. S. Young, Clive Shaw, Jana Horák, Dave Jones, Nick James, Steve Bosley, Alan Shuttleworth, Paul Dickinson, Ian McMullan, Derek Robson, Andrew R. D. Smedley, Ben Stanley, Richard Bassom, Mark McIntyre, Adam Suttle, Richard Fleet, Luc Bastiaens, Míra B. Ihász, Sarah McMullan, Sarah Boazman, Zachary I. Dickeson, P. M. Grindrod, A. E. Pickersgill, Colin J. Weir, Fiona M. Suttle, Sarah Farrelly, Ieun Spencer, Sheeraz Naqvi, Ben Mayne, Dan Skilton, Dan Kirk, Ann Mounsey, Sally E. Mounsey, Sarah Mounsey, Pamela Godfrey, Lachlan Bond, Victoria Bond, Cathryn Wilcock, Hannah Wilcock, Rob Wilcock

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Advances · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsBP (Canada)Western University
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Environment Research CouncilUK Research and InnovationEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAVEuropean Regional Development FundEuropean CommissionSight Research UKUniversity of GlasgowObservatoire de Paris, Université de Recherche Paris Sciences et LettresAgence Nationale de la RechercheMuséum National d'Histoire NaturelleNuclear Safety and Security CommissionNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsMeteoriteAstrobiologyWitnessSolar SystemMaterials scienceBiologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Direct links between carbonaceous chondrites and their parent bodies in the solar system are rare. The Winchcombe meteorite is the most accurately recorded carbonaceous chondrite fall. Its pre-atmospheric orbit and cosmic-ray exposure age confirm that it arrived on Earth shortly after ejection from a primitive asteroid. Recovered only hours after falling, the composition of the Winchcombe meteorite is largely unmodified by the terrestrial environment. It contains abundant hydrated silicates formed during fluid-rock reactions, and carbon- and nitrogen-bearing organic matter including soluble protein amino acids. The near-pristine hydrogen isotopic composition of the Winchcombe meteorite is comparable to the terrestrial hydrosphere, providing further evidence that volatile-rich carbonaceous asteroids played an important role in the origin of Earth's water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience AdvancesSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207