Generative adversarial network constrained multiple loss autoencoder: A deep learning‐based individual atrophy detection for Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exploring individual brain atrophy patterns is of great value in precision medicine for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, the current individual brain atrophy detection models are deficient. Here, we proposed a framework called generative adversarial network constrained multiple loss autoencoder (GANCMLAE) for precisely depicting individual atrophy patterns. The GANCMLAE model was trained using normal controls (NCs) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort, and the Xuanwu cohort was employed to validate the robustness of the model. The potential of the model for identifying different atrophy patterns of MCI subtypes was also assessed. Furthermore, the clinical application potential of the GANCMLAE model was investigated. The results showed that the model can achieve good image reconstruction performance on the structural similarity index measure (0.929 ± 0.003), peak signal-to-noise ratio (31.04 ± 0.09), and mean squared error (0.0014 ± 0.0001) with less latent loss in the Xuanwu cohort. The individual atrophy patterns extracted from this model are more precise in reflecting the clinical symptoms of MCI subtypes. The individual atrophy patterns exhibit a better discriminative power in identifying patients with AD and MCI from NCs than those of the t-test model, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.867 (95%: 0.837-0.897) and 0.752 (95%: 0.71-0.790), respectively. Similar findings are also reported in the AD and MCI subgroups. In conclusion, the GANCMLAE model can serve as an effective tool for individualised atrophy detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".