MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Spike Compression through Selective Downsampling and Piecewise Curve Fitting Dedicated to Neural Recording Brain Implants

2022· article· en· W4309263363 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUpsamplingSpike (software development)Brain implantComputer scienceCMOSPiecewiseArtificial neural networkData compressionCompandingNeuromorphic engineeringApplication-specific integrated circuitArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmElectronic engineeringChannel (broadcasting)Computer hardwareMathematicsEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a method for data reduction in high-density neural recording brain-implantable microsystems. In the proposed method, neural spikes are segmented based on selective downsampling on the implant side of the system. On the external side, neural spikes are reconstructed by piecewise fitting of third-order polynomials. Using this idea, a 128-channel spike compressor was designed in a 130-nm CMOS technology with a chip area of 1050µmx350µm. Tested using a library of four prerecorded neural signals with different waveshapes, an average compression rate of ~272 was achieved. Operated at a clock rate of 1 MHz, the circuit consumes 21µW @V <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">DD</inf> =1V.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it