MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309263709 · doi:10.1159/000526637

Superior Division Third Nerve Palsy as the Presenting Sign of Metastatic Breast Cancer

2022· article· en· W4309263709 on OpenAlex
Amir R. Vosoughi, Jonathan A. Micieli

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCase Reports in Ophthalmology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMeningioma and schwannoma management
Canadian institutionsKensington HealthUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePtosisPalsyMetastasisSurgeryRadiologyCancerPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The third cranial nerve divides into superior and inferior branches at the level of anterior carotid sinus and superior orbital fissure. In extremely rare scenarios, metastatic lesions at this location may present with divisional third nerve involvement. We here describe an 85-year-old woman who presented with superior division third nerve palsy due to breast cancer metastasis. Our case demonstrates the rare presentation of double vision and ptosis because of superior division third nerve palsy. The differential diagnosis for this examination finding should include metastatic disease even in the absence of a known cancer diagnosis. This case also reiterates that the "rule of the pupil" should not be applied to superior division third nerve palsy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it