MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309269446 · doi:10.14692/jfi.16.4.177-184

Diagnosis of Corm Rot Disease of Taro: Case Study at Maybrat - West Papua

2022· article· id· W4309269446 on OpenAlexaff
Paulus Woyen, Meity Suradji Sinaga, Efi Toding Tondok, Bonny Poernomo Wahyu Soekarno

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Fitopatologi Indonesia/Jurnal Fitopatologi · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Talas (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) merupakan tanaman herba yang telah dimanfaatkan sebagai bahan pangan di beberapa wilayah di dunia. Tanaman ini dipercaya berasal dari Asia Tenggara (Lebot et al. 2010). Di Maybrat, Papua Barat talas telah dimanfaatkan sebagai tanaman bahan pangan pokok utama sejak dahulu oleh masyrakat lokal dan disebut dengan nama ‘Wiah atau Awiah’. Hingga awal tahun 2013, belum terdapat laporan yang memadai terkait serangan hama dan penyakit tanaman talas di daerah ini. Namun, pada pertengahan tahun 2013 petani setempat melaporkan adanya epidemi penyakit busuk umbi talas di pertanamannya. Tujuan penelitian ini ialah untuk membuktikan penyebab penyakit busuk umbi talas di Maybrat. Pengujian dilakukan secara in vivo dan in planta pada umbi dan tanaman talas. Dari 38 isolat cendawan yang diisolasi, 50% bersifat patogen. Tiga isolat yang terpilih (Y1, YP1, dan S4) mampu menyebabkan pembusukan jaringan umbi secara in vivo dan kerusakan akar secara in planta. Uji in planta menunjukkan bahwa inokulasi gabungan dua isolat dari ketiganya mampu menyebabkan kerusakan akar yang berat. Secara morfologi, isolat YP1 dan S4 diidentifikasi sebagai Fusarium oxysporum dan Y1 merupakan F. solani. Ini merupakan laporan yang pertama tentang penyakit busuk umbi talas dari Maybrat, Papua Barat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Fitopatologi Indonesia/Jurnal FitopatologiSame topicPlant Growth and Agriculture TechniquesFrench-language works237,207