MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309307527 · doi:10.3390/app122211622

Flood Prediction with Two-Dimensional Shallow Water Equations: A Case Study of Tongo-Bassa Watershed in Cameroon

2022· article· en· W4309307527 on OpenAlexaff
Alain Joel Elong, Ling Zhou, Bryan Karney, Haoyu Fang, Yun Cao, Steve L. Zeh Assam

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfiltration (HVAC)WatershedFinite volume methodHydrology (agriculture)Flood mythEnvironmental scienceUpwind schemeGeologyMathematicsGeotechnical engineeringMeteorologyMechanicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a result of urbanization, combined with the anthropogenic effects of climate change, natural events such as floods are showing increasingly adverse impacts on human existence. This study proposes a new model, based on shallow water equations, that is able to predict these floods and minimize their impacts. The first-order finite volume method (FVM), the Harten Lax and van Leer (HLL) scheme, and the monotone upwind scheme for conservation laws (MUSCL) are applied in the model. In addition, a virtual boundary cell approach is adopted to achieve a monotonic solution for both interior and boundary cells and flux computations at the boundary cells. The model integrates the infiltration parameters recorded in the area, as well as the Manning coefficient specific to each land-cover type of the catchment region. The results provided were mapped to highlight the potential flood zones and the distribution of water heights throughout the catchment region at any given time, as well as that at the outlet. It has been observed that when standard infiltration and the Manning parameters were selected, the floodable surface increased, as expected, with the increasing rainfall intensity and duration of the simulation. With sufficient infiltration, only a portion of the water tends to stagnate and flow off on the surface toward the outlet. A sensitivity analysis of certain parameters, such as rainfall data and the final infiltration coefficient in the lower watershed of the littoral region, was conducted; the results show that the model simulates well the general character of water flow in the watershed. Finally, the model’s validation using field-collected parameters during the flood of 25 July 2017 and 18 to 22 July 2016 in the Grand Ouaga basin in Burkina reveals Nash–Sutcliffe values of 0.7 and 0.73, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207