Bibliographic record
Abstract
La fortune du théâtre de Molière sur la scène italienne remonte à la seconde moitié du XXe siècle. En l'espace de quelques décennies, le dramaturge presque inconnu du grand public, inspire les plus grands metteurs en scène italiens qui, à travers ses comédies, abordent la question complexe de la mise en scène des classiques dans le monde contemporain. La découverte de Molière a comblé, comme l'avait deviné Cesare Garboli, une lacune dans la tradition théâtrale italienne, celle de la comédie bourgeoise et de ses valeurs liées absentes, à la même époque, dans la société italienne. En même temps, la nécessité d'adapter et d'actualiser le texte de Molière par rapport à la langue théâtrale italienne, remet en cause les choix de traduction et impose de nouveaux défis au jeu de l'acteur. A la fin du siècle on peut constater que Molière est définitivement entré dans le répertoire théâtral italien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.064 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".